Frontiers | Mortality rate and predictors among neonates admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a retrospective follow-up study (2024)

1 Introduction

The neonatal phase (the first 28 days of life) is the most critical period for a child's survival (1). Even though being a newborn is not an illness, many children die soon after delivery, many of them in the first four weeks of life (neonatal deaths), and the majority of those in the first week of life (early neonatal deaths) (2). Every day, an estimated 6,500 newborn fatalities occur worldwide, and one-third of all newborn deaths occur within the first day of life, with the remaining three-quarters happening within the first week (3).

According to global estimates, 2.4 million neonatal deaths (nearly 6,700 neonatal deaths per day) occurred in 2019, accounting for 44% of all fatalities among children under the age of five (4, 5), of which 98% occurred in developing countries. Per 1,000 live births, the rate of death in developing and developed countries was 28.2 and 3.5, respectively (6). The rate of newborn mortality is also unequally spread between different regions and countries (7); for instance, a child born in Sub-Saharan Africa is ten times more likely to die than a child who is born in a high-income country (8).

This neonatal period is a highly vulnerable time for the neonate, who is completing many of the physiological adjustments required for extra-uterine existence (911). Despite the fact that neonatal mortality is declining at a slower rate than post-neonatal and under-five mortality, success in lowering the death of newborns under the age of one month has been insignificant (12).

Neonatal death in Ethiopia decreased from 39 to 29 between 2005 and 2016, but has increased to 33 in 2019 (13), which contributed to 42% of under-five mortality (14). However, a 2020 national report estimated that neonatal mortality in Ethiopia is reduced to 27 deaths per 1,000 live births (15), suggesting that there is still much work to be done to accomplish the sustainable development goal of 12/1,000 live births (16). Moreover, according to WHO estimates, the major causes of newborn deaths in Ethiopia includes pregnancy and delivery-associated events (30%), premature birth problems (26%), sepsis (18%), congenital abnormalities (11%), and pneumonia (8%) (17).

The incidence of neonatal mortality in Ethiopia was reported to be 25.8 deaths per 1,000 neonate days in North East Ethiopia (18), 1.3 per 1,000 live births in Southern Ethiopia (19), and 62.5 per 1,000 live births in Northern Ethiopia (20). Several predictors of newborn mortality have been identified in Ethiopia, including being born from a diabetes mellitus (DM) mother, a previous history of neonatal death, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), ANC follow-up, neonatal sepsis, marital status, birth weight at admission, gestational age less than 28 weeks, complications at birth, delayed initiation of breast-feeding, home delivery, birth interval, mode of delivery, hypoglycemia, age of neonate at admission, being born from pre-eclampsia/eclamptic mothers, and being extremely low birth weight (2123).

Despite several initiatives and implementations targeted at lowering neonatal mortality in Ethiopia, it remains high and has not been reduced as expected. Furthermore, knowing the context-specific determinants of neonatal mortality and morbidity is critical for reducing newborn death. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the mortality rate and predictors of neonatal mortality among neonates admitted to the NICU of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in 2023.

2 Methods

2.1 Study area and period

The study was carried out at the Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Addis Ababa is the capital city of Ethiopia and the largest city, with an estimated population of 5,005,524. Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH) is the largest public teaching hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital NICU ward can accommodate a maximum of 60 patients with an average of 20–40 patients' daily admission. The data was collected from July 1st to July 30th, 2023.

2.2 Study design and population

A retrospective follow-up study was conducted among neonates who were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022.

2.3 Eligibility criteria

All non-surgical neonates who were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were included. However, a neonate who was admitted to the NICU but who had incomplete charts and surgical causes of NICU admitted cases were excluded from the study.

2.4 Sample size determination and sampling procedure

The sample size was determined by using the double population proportion formula in the Epi Info Stat calc program by considering the following assumptions: 95% CI, power 80%, ratio of unexposed to exposed: 1:2, and parameters: outcome in exposed (gestational age < 37 weeks): 22.2% (24), and 10% incomplete data, giving a total of 466. Outcome in unexposed (gestational age > 37 weeks) = 5.42% and risk ratio (RR) = 4.09.

There were 824, 647, and 541 cases during 2020, 2021 and 2022 respectively. Using a population proportion allocation we selected a total of 191, 150 and 125 cases from each years respectively using a simple random sampling technique.

2.5 Study variables

Neonatal death (event or censored) was considered an outcome variable, and the independent variables were categorized as socio-demographic factors, maternal factors, neonatal factors, and obstetrical factors.

2.6 Data collection procedure

Data were extracted using a pretested and structured checklist developed after reviewing previous published articles (25, 26) with a relevant modification. The extraction checklist had five components including socio-demographic characteristics, maternal obstetric factors, neonatal factors, follow-up information, and the overall neonatal status. It was pretested with twenty three neonates admitted and treated at St. Paul's Hospital Mellinium Medical College neonatal intensive care unit. The data were extracted by three professional nurses and supervised by the principal investigators. Data extractors were trained for one day before the actual data collection period. Every day, after data collection, each checklist was reviewed and checked for completeness and consistency.

2.7 Data processing and analysis

Data was cleaned, edited, coded, entered into Epi-Info software, and exported to SPSS version 26. The Cox-proportional hazard model was used to identify predictors of neonatal mortality rate in the NICU. The strength of association was measured using adjusted hazard ratio, and reported along with a 95% CI and a p-value.

Mortality rate was compared using Nelson-Alan curves together with log rank test over differences categorical variables. The determinants of neonatal mortality were first screened using a bi-variable Cox regression analysis model. Then variables with a p-value less than 0.25 were chosen as candidate variables for the multi-variable Cox regression model.

3 Results

3.1 Socio-demographic characteristics

A total of 459 complete records were included in the study, with a response rate of 98.5%. The majority of 431 (94.5%) neonates were aged less than 7 days. Nearly half (50.9%) of the neonates were female. Regarding the age of the mothers, more than three-fourths (397, or 87.1%) of them were aged between 18 and 34 years. The vast majority 432 (94.7%) of mothers had a history of previous neonatal deaths. Moreover, 439 (96.3%) and 405 (88.8%) of mothers had ANC follow-up 1st and 4th ANC visits, respectively (Table1).

Table 1

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants.

3.2 Obstetrical and neonatal factors

Three hundred eighty-seven (84.9%) of the neonates had five APGAR scores, and only one fifth of them (20.3%) had an APGAR score of 7–10. With regard to the weight at birth, 178 (39%) of neonates weighed <2,500 g. The majority of 289 (63.4%) of the neonates had initiated exclusive breast feeding within the first hour after birth. Concerning the mode of neonatal delivery, 282 (61.8%) of them were delivered via spontaneous vagin*l delivery, and 170 (37.3%) of them were delivered by cesarean section, whereas the left was delivered by assisted instrumental delivery (Table2).

Table 2

Table 2. Obstetric and neonatal factors.

Moreover, concerning the diagnosis during admission, the most common causes were neonatal sepsis 83 (18.1%), premature rupture of membranes 39 (8.5%), respiratory distress 45 (9.8%), preterm and low birth weight 80 (17.4%), and RH incompatibility 22 (4.8%) (Figure1).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Diagnosis during admission.

3.3 Neonatal mortality rate

According to the finding of this study, neonatal mortality rate was 3.1 (95% CI: 1.3–4.9), per 1,000 neonates-days.

3.4 Predictors associated with neonatal mortality rate

Based on the result of a bi-variable cox proportional hazard regression analysis, predictors like age of neonate in day, sex of the neonate, previous history of neonatal death, ANC follow-up, previous history of pregnancy, APGAR score, birth weight, exclusive breast-feeding initiation, and time of exclusive breast feeding were the predictors of neonatal mortality with a p-value less than 0.25.

Furthermore, the multi-variable cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that only low birthweight, exclusive breast-feeding, and exclusive breast feeding initiation time were the predictors of neonatal mortality rate. Subsequently, low birth weight newborns had a 44% higher risk of developing neonatal mortality compared with their counter peers (AHR = 1.44: 95% CI: 1.06–3.13). On the other hand exclusive breast feeding were protective against neonatal mortality. Those neonates who were exclusive breast feeding had a 26% lower risk of developing neonatal mortality compared with its counter parts (AHR = 0.74: 95% CI: 0.35–0.95). Moreover, those mothers who initiated exclusive breast feeding within the first one hour had 18% lower risk of neonatal mortality compared with its counter parts (AHR = 0.92: 95% CI: 0.49–0.99) (Table3).

Table 3

4 Discussion

The results of this study showed that the neonatal mortality rate was 3.1 (95% CI: 1.3–4.9) per 1,000 neonate-days. This study finding was consistent with a study conducted in Kersa district, Ethiopia, which showed that the overall neonatal mortality rate was 28.37 per 1,000 live births (27). Furthermore, this study finding was in line with a study conducted in Uganda, which elucidated that the incidence of neonatal mortality in Uganda was 30 deaths per 1,000 live births (3 per 100 person days) (28). Additionally, this study finding was consistent with the study conducted at Fallujah General Hospital, which showed that the neonatal mortality rate was 50.3/1,000 of total births, while the neonatal mortality was 41.5/1,000 of total live births in the same area (29).

However, this study finding was lower than the study conducted in the rural northern part of Ethiopia, and Tigray Ethiopia which revealed that neonatal mortality rate was 18.6 per 1,000 neonate days and 62.5 respectively (30). This inconsistency might be due to the differences in study period, study setting and healthcare service improvements over time. The fact that this study was carried out in Ethiopia's capital city might have contributed to the reduced rate of neonatal mortality because of the existence of comprehensive and specialized hospitals like Black lion.

The findings of this study also showed that those neonates with a birth weight of <2,500 grams were 1.44 times more likely to have a high risk of dying than their counter peers (AHR1.44; 95% CI: 1.06–3.13). This study finding was consistent with a study conducted in India and Brazil which showed that neonates born with a normal birth weight (2,500–3,500 g) had a 55% lower hazard of neonatal death compared to neonates born with birth weights of less than 2,500 g (low birth weight) (31, 32). The possible justification behind this might be due to the fact that low birth weight is linked to a variety of negative health outcomes, including prenatal and neonatal mortality and morbidity, impaired growth and cognitive development, and even a non-communicable diseases risk later in their life.

Neonatal mortality was also associated with exclusive breast feeding initiation and the time of exclusive breast feeding. Those newborns who initiated exclusive breast feeding on time had a 36% lower risk of neonatal death compared with their counterparts. This finding was supported by similar studies from the Northwest and Bahir Dar, Ethiopia (33, 34). This might be due to the fact that breast milk is the ideal nutrient for a newborn and is easily digestible, absorbable, and metabolized, promoting bonding, improved behavioral and neurodevelopment, protecting against various infectious diseases, and promoting long-term health, which ultimately reduces neonatal mortality if practiced optimally.

4.1 Strengths and limitations of the study

This study's merits include the use of a relatively larger sample sizes and statistical analyses relevant to the study design. On the other hand, the study was conducted in a hospital; as a result, newborns that were born and died at home may have been overlooked. Therefore, this study does not reflect population-based neonatal mortality.

5 Conclusion

The neonatal mortality rate was high. Weight of the neonate, exclusive breast feeding initiation, and time of exclusive breast feeding were independent predictors of neonatal death. Therefore, empowering mothers to breastfeed their children exclusively, which is a cost-effective, safe, and feasible method, can significantly reduce infant mortality.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Yanet College research and ethical review committee. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The Ethics Committee/institutional review board waived the requirement of written informed consent for participation from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin because Due to the fact that we used only secondary data.

Author contributions

GG: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. MB: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft. TA: Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. MD: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Software, Writing – review & editing. SJ: Data curation, Software, Validation, Writing – review & editing. TS: Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the study participants and data collectors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Quamrul HC, Islam R, Hossain K. Effects of demographic characteristics on neonatal, post neonatal, infant and child mortality. J Biol Sci. (2010) 2:132–8. ISSN: 2041-0778

Google Scholar

2. Pathirana J, Muñoz FM, Abbing-Karahagopian V, Bhat N, Harris T, Kapoor A, et al. Neonatal death: case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine. (2016) 34(49):6027–37. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.040

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Howard CR, Gbadero DA, Slusher TM, Bode-Thomas F. Evidenced based medical care of hospitalized children with local adaptations in low-resource settings. Front Pediatr Sec Children and Health. (2023) 31:1–2. doi: 10.3389/978-2-8325-3210-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. White H, Saran A. UNICEF Strategic Plan 2018-2021 Goal Area 1: Every Child Survives and Thrives. Evidence and Gap Map Research Brief. Innocenti Research Brief 2022-04. UNICEF Office of Research-Innocenti (2022).

5. UNICEF D. UNICEF Data: Monitoring the Situation of Children and Women. New York: Unicef (2016).

6. World Health Organization. World Health Report 2013: Research for Universal Health Coverage. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (2013).

7. Fund U. Every Child Alive, the Urgent Need to End Newborn Deaths. New York, United States of America: The United Nations Children’s Fund (2018).

8. Olusanya BO, Boo NY, de Camargo OK, Hadders-Algra M, Wertlieb D, Davis AC. Global research on developmental disabilities collaborators. Child health, inclusive education and development. Bull W H O. (2022) 100(7):459. doi: 10.2471/BLT.22.288103

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Muthoka JK. The effect of early intermittent Kangaroo mother care on neonatal mortality, morbidity and weight gain in stable low birth weight infants (doctoral dissertation, jkuat-cohes).

10. World Health Organization. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990–2015: Estimates from WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (2015).

11. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee ACC, Waiswa P, et al. Every newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. (2014) 384(9938):189–205. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. United Nation Children’s Fund (UNICEF), World Health Organization (WHO), World Bank & United Nation (UN) (2019). Level and trend in child mortality: Estimates developed by the UN Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation Report.

13. Indicators K. Mini Demographic and Health Survey. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: EPHI and ICF (2019).

14. Mehretie Adinew Y, Feleke SA, Mengesha ZB, Workie SB. Childhood mortality: trends and determinants in Ethiopia from 1990 to 2015—a systematic review. Adv Public Health. (2017) 2017:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2017/7479295

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Nyoni SP, Nyoni T. Forecasting infant mortality rate in Ethiopia using artificial neural networks. Int Res J Innov Eng Technol. (2021) 5(3):647. doi: 10.47001/IRJIET/2021.503112

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Arora NK, Mishra I. United nations sustainable development goals 2030 and environmental sustainability: race against time. Environ Sustain. (2019) 2(4):339–42. doi: 10.1007/s42398-019-00092-y

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Strong KL, Pedersen J, Johansson EW, et al. Patterns and trends in causes of child and adolescent mortality 2000–2016: setting the scene for child health redesign. BMJ Global Health. (2021) 6(3):e004760. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004760

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Alebel A, Wagnew F, Petrucka P, Tesema C, Moges NA, Ketema DB, et al. Neonatal mortality in the neonatal intensive care unit of Debre Markos referral hospital, northwest Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr. (2020) 20:1. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1963-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Gizaw M, Molla M, Mekonnen W. Trends and risk factors for neonatal mortality in butajira district, south central Ethiopia, (1987-2008): a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2014) 14:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-64

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Mengesha HG, Wuneh AD, Lerebo WT, Tekle TH. Survival of neonates and predictors of their mortality in tigray region, northern Ethiopia: prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2016) 16(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0994-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Ouédraogo A, Pison G, Le Coeur S, Soura A. Levels, trends, and factors associated with under-5 excess mortality among twins in sub-saharan Africa: studies of national surveys from 42 countries. XXIXe congrès international de la population de l'UIESP 2021 (IPC 2021) (2021). p. 36

22. Getahun GK, Assfaw A, Muhammad EA, sh*temaw T. Prevalence and correlates of stunting and thinness among adolescent students in lideta subcity, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. (2023) 13(5):e065347. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065347

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Onasoga A, Oluwatosin O, Ojo A. Predictors of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Arch Appl Sci Res. (2014) 4(3):1511–6. ISSN: 0975-508X

Google Scholar

24. Ndombo PK, Ekei QM, Tochie JN, Temgoua MN, Endomba T, Ntock FN, et al. A cohort analysis of neonatal hospital mortality rate and predictors of neonatal mortality in a sub-urban hospital of Cameroon. Ital J Pediatr. (2017) 43:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13052-017-0369-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Mengistu BA, Yismaw AE, Azene ZN, Mihret MS. Incidence and predictors of neonatal mortality among neonates admitted in amhara regional state referral hospitals, Ethiopia: prospective follow up study. BMC Pediatr. (2020) 20:1–4. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02031-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Desalew A, Sintayehu Y, Teferi N, Amare F, Geda B, Worku T, et al. Cause and predictors of neonatal mortality among neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units of public hospitals in eastern Ethiopia: a facility-based prospective follow-up study. BMC Pediatr. (2020) 20:1. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02051-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Desta BN, Kassa NA, Damte TD, Hordofa LO. Incidence and risk factors of neonatal mortality in eastern Ethiopia, a prospective cohort study in Kersa health and demographic surveillance system (Kersa HDSS). Epidemiol Biostat Public Health. (2016) 13(4):1–8. doi: 10.2427/11938

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Musooko M, Kakaire O, Nakimuli A, Nakubulwa S, Nankunda J, Osinde MO, et al. Incidence and risk factors for early neonatal mortality in newborns with severe perinatal morbidity in Uganda. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. (2014) 127(2):201–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.05.017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Samira T A, Yaseen Taha S, Abdulsattar Kadhem L. Perinatal and neonatal mortality in Fallujah general hospital, Fallujah city, Anbar province, west of Iraq. Health. (2012) 2012:597–600. doi: 10.4236/health.2012.49093

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Robel Y, Mitike M, Lynn S. Determinants of neonatal mortality in rural northern Ethiopia. PLoS One. (2017) 12(4):6–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172875

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Ravi S, Aaradhana S, Durgesh K, Rajesh Y, Singh KD, Shukla KM. Predictors of neonatal mortality referred to a tertiary care teaching institute. Indian J Child Health. (2016) 3(2):156. doi: 10.32677/IJCH.2016.v03.i02.016

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Bogale W, Assaye K, Amha M, Birkneh T, Alemayehu W. Predictors of early neonatal mortality. Ethiop J Health Dev. (2012) 26(3):200–7. doi: 10.4314/ejhd.v16i3.9796

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Yared M, Biruk T, Daniel S, Tedbabe D, Abeba B. Neonatal mortality in Ethiopia: trends and determinants. BMC public Health. (2013) 13:483. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-483

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Diallo A, Meda N, Ouédraogo W, Cousens S, Tylleskar T. A prospective study on neonatal mortality and its predictors in a rural area in Burkina Faso. J Perinatol. (2011) 31:656–63. doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Frontiers | Mortality rate and predictors among neonates admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a retrospective follow-up study (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Ouida Strosin DO

Last Updated:

Views: 6173

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (56 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ouida Strosin DO

Birthday: 1995-04-27

Address: Suite 927 930 Kilback Radial, Candidaville, TN 87795

Phone: +8561498978366

Job: Legacy Manufacturing Specialist

Hobby: Singing, Mountain biking, Water sports, Water sports, Taxidermy, Polo, Pet

Introduction: My name is Ouida Strosin DO, I am a precious, combative, spotless, modern, spotless, beautiful, precious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.